May 18, 2012

News About Iraqi Dinar

Iraqi Dinar Exchange Rate

Currency Exchange News

US threatens sanctions against India over Iran oil

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55569-US-threatens-sanctions-against-India-over-Iran-oil&goto=newpost

US threatens sanctions against India over Iran oil

Chidanand Rajghatta, TNN | Mar 16, 2012, 12.13AM IST

WASHINGTON: The Obama administration is threatening to impose sanctions on India over its continued economic ties with Iran amid disagreements between Washington and New Delhi over how much and how soon the latter is reducing oil imports from the (in US eyes) pariah nation.

India has “failed” to reduce its purchase of Iranian oil and if it doesn’t do so, President Barack Obama may be “forced” to impose sanction, unnamed administration officials were cited as telling Bloomberg wire service. A decision in this regard could come as early as June 28, they added, implicitly offering New Delhi a ten- week window to show a decline in Iranian oil imports.

Indian officials have contested the US assessment by insisting New Delhi is scaling down Iranian oil imports with more reduction in the pipeline, but that concession has been offset by India’s commerce ministry’s well-publicized efforts to ramp up trade with Iran in other areas, a move that has not gone unnoticed by the powerful pro-Israeli lobby in US.

The potent American Jewish Committee (AJC), which holds Israeli interests dear to its heart, raged against an Indian business delegation being shepherded to Iran by the Indian commerce ministry, pointing to it as an example of New Delhi’s perfidy at a time Israel is India’s close military and counter-terrorism partner.

That prompted a strong rebuttal from the Indian embassy in Washington, accusing certain lobbies of presenting a “distorted picture of New Delhi’s foreign policy objectives and energy security needs” by selective use of data about its imports from Iran.

But the anti-Iran lobby in US has been galvanized by a report on Wednesday from the International Energy Agency (IEA), showing that India and South Korea “sharply” increased their oil imports from Iran in January.

However, India has informally conveyed to Washington that it has advised its refineries, many of which are geared towards processing Iranian crude, to seek alternate supplies and gradually reduce their dependence on Iran. That process may take some time to kick in since annual crude contracts with Iran are April to March, so the reduction will start to show from next month.

India has enough time to show compliance since the US law relating to sanctions vis-a-vis Iran kicks in only if countries don’t make a “significant” cuts in their Iranian crude oil purchases during the first half of this year. The law does not specify by what percentage a nation must reduce its imports to qualify for an exemption from sanctions, so countries like South Korea and Japan have been negotiating with Washington the quantum of cuts they can live with. India is also believed to be in discussion with U.S in this matter.

While the impending Indian compliance has been quietly acknowledged by some Obama administration officials, the hardline pro-Israeli lobby in US is champing at the bit. At a Congressional hearing earlier this month Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told lawmakers that while the US remains concerned about India’s links with Iran, she acknowledged that New Delhi is ”heading in the right direction”.

“In fact, I think in a number of instances, the actions of countries and their banks are better than the public statements that we sometimes hear them making,” Clinton said in an indication of the Indian assurances.

The Obama administration itself is in a bind over squeezing too hard and tightening oil supplies across the world. While Washington has offered to wean India and other countries from Iranian oil by arranging supplies from Saudi Arabia and Iraq, that could come at its own expense and rising oil prices. Already, gas prices are close to $ 4 a gallon at US pumps, and it is a well-acknowledged fact that the fortunes of US politicians running for high office is linked to pain (or otherwise) at the pump.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/w…w/12282588.cms

Iran official: Israel isn’t powerful enough to fulfill military threats

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55570-Iran-official-Israel-isn-t-powerful-enough-to-fulfill-military-threats&goto=newpost

Published 18:43 15.03.12
Latest update 18:43 15.03.12

Iran official: Israel isn’t powerful enough to fulfill military threats

Speaking during tour of southern Lebanon, Ahmadinejad’s press adviser says possible Iranian counterstrike would reach beyond ‘Zionist regime,’ include U.S. bases.
By Haaretz

Israel is too weak to fulfill its threats against Iran, an adviser to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during a visit to southern Lebanon on Wednesday, adding that Iran’s counter attack in case of an assault against it would include U.S. targets.

The Iranian official’s remarks came after, on Wednesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an apparent reference to the possibility of an attack of Iran’s nuclear facilities, said that Israel didn’t always heed to U.S. warnings against offensive action, citing such examples as the Six-Day War and the 1981 strike against an Iraqi nuclear reactor.

Also on Wednesday, U.S. President Barack Obama said thatthe window for a diplomatic solution with Iran over its nuclear program was “shrinking,” urging Tehran to seize the opportunity of talks with world leaders to avert “even worse consequences.”

Speaking during a tour of the south Lebanon town of Maran al-Ras, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s press advisor Ali Akbar Javanfekr, played down the possibility of an Israelui strike on Iran, saying that the “Zionist regime is weaker than being able to fulfill its threats against Islamic Republic.”

“Iran is not afraid of any enemy, including the occupying force of Zionist regime,” Javanfekr was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency.

Ahmadinejad’s press adviser also warned of the severity of a potential Iranian counterstrike, saying that the “consequences of any attack on Iran will not be limited to the Zionist regime and its allies, including the U.S. will be the target of Tehran’s reaction; Washington officials are well aware about the devastating answer of Iran to any aggression.”

On Thursday, an international network in control of the world’s largest financial messaging system announced intended to cut off Iranian banks targeted by European Union sanctions.

The move by SWIFT represents an unprecedented measure that will effectively prevent Iranian institutions from electronically transferring global funds.


http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac…reats-1.418905

Report of strategic reserve release denied by Obama administration

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55571-Report-of-strategic-reserve-release-denied-by-Obama-administration&goto=newpost

Report of strategic reserve release denied by Obama administration

By Steven Mufson, Updated: Thursday, March 15, 11:34 AM

Oil prices dropped quickly Thursday on a news report that Britain and the United States would cooperate on a release of crude oil from strategic reserves, but the Obama administration said the report was “not accurate” and played down the talks with British officials.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said, “Among the many topics of discussion the British prime minister and president had were energy issues and the situation globally with the rise in the price of oil,” but he added that “I can say very clearly that the report” that there was an agreement on specific actions or a timetable for those actions “is false. It is not accurate.”

“The report of any kind of agreement or timetable associated with an agreement on a course of action is just wrong,” Carney said.

Earlier, Reuters reported that Britain had agreed to cooperate with the United States to dampen high oil prices and prevent them from slowing down economic growth in an election year.

On the New York Mercantile Exchange, the price of the benchmark West Texas Intermediate grade of crude oil, which had climbed to $ 106.18 a barrel, fell about $ 2 a barrel. They started climbing again in early afternoon after the White House denied the Reuters report.

Many oil experts said the Obama administration would remain under pressure to release strategic reserves because of the soaring price of gasoline. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman was in Kuwait for a conference earlier this week and warned oil exporters that high prices could derail the economic recovery.

Bob McNally, president of the consulting firm Rapidan Group, said, “It’s more when rather than if. Washington is getting ready for it. How much and when I’m not sure, but I imagine in time for spring gasoline season.” McNally warned, however, that a release would not have a lasting impact.

The high price of crude oil has been driving a sharp increase in gasoline prices, which in turn have been battering Obama’s approval ratings. The United States maintains a 696 million barrel Strategic Petroleum Reserve in a handful of giant salt caverns along the Gulf of Mexico coast.

The reserves have been tapped only three times, first on the opening day of Operation Desert Storm against Iraq under President George H.W. Bush, then under President George W. Bush after Hurricane Katrina, and again last year when civil war in Libya curtailed the north African nation’s 1.6 million barrels a day of exports.

There have also been smaller oil swaps carried out in which companies can use some of the reserve’s oil and give back an equal physical amount at a later date. President Clinton authorized such a swap in 2000.

The strategic reserve was designed to be used only in the event of a major supply disruption, not as a tool for taming prices. The administration might argue that a series of events in places like Sudan, Yemen and Syria have added up to a loss of several hundred thousand barrels a day. But those conditions aren’t likely to change, analysts noted, and therefore markets could remain tight.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine…NES_story.html

EXCLUSIVE-UPDATE 4-U.S., UK set to agree emergency oil stocks release

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55572-EXCLUSIVE-UPDATE-4-U-S-UK-set-to-agree-emergency-oil-stocks-release&goto=newpost

EXCLUSIVE-UPDATE 4-U.S., UK set to agree emergency oil stocks release

Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:15pm GMT

* UK expects request from U.S. to cooperate on release
* UK to respond positively, detail seen by summer
* IEA resists coordinated stock release, sees no shortage
* Iran sanctions behind oil price increase to $ 124

(Recasts first paragraph, adds comments from Prime Minister
Cameron in paragraphs 4 and 5)
By Richard Mably

LONDON, March 15 (Reuters) – Britain is poised to
cooperate with the United States on a release of strategic oil
stocks that is expected within months, two British sources said,
in a bid to prevent fuel prices choking economic growth in a
U.S. election year.

A formal request from the United States to the UK to join
forces in a release of oil from government-controlled reserves
is expected “shortly” following a meeting on Wednesday in
Washington between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister
David Cameron, who discussed the issue, one source said.

Britain would respond positively, the two sources said, and
Cameron said the issue of reserve levels was worth considering.

“We didn’t make any decision, this has to be discussed
broadly. We’ve got to look at this issue carefully, it’s
something worth looking at. Short-term should we look at
reserves? Yes, we should,” Cameron said during a meeting with
students in New York.

“We’d both like to see global oil prices at a lower level
than they are.”

Details of the timing, volume and duration of a new
emergency drawdown have yet to be settled but a detailed
agreement is expected by the summer, one of the sources said.

Other countries may also be approached by Washington to
contribute, a further source said, Japan among them.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama and Cameron
discussed rising oil prices, but he declined to comment on
whether the leaders discussed a release of reserves.

He said no deal had been reached on a release or timetable for such a move.
“As has been the case every time I’m asked about that issue
(the Strategic Petroleum Reserve), I’m not going to discuss
specifics about it,” Carney said.

“I can tell you that among the many topics of discussion
that the British prime minister and the president had were
energy issues and the situation globally with the rise in the
price of oil.”

Rising world oil prices have pushed the cost of gasoline in
the U.S. up sharply, threatening to stall economic recovery
ahead of Obama’s bid for re-election in November.

Brent crude has gained more than 15 percent since January to
a peak of over $ 128 a barrel, in a repeat of last year’s spike
in fuel costs when the loss of Libyan oil supplies during civil
war triggered a coordinated International Energy Agency (IEA)
stock drawdown.

Brent for May tumbled $ 1.98 to settle at $ 122.60 a barrel on
Thursday.

Previous emergency oil releases have been coordinated by the
Paris-based IEA to meet its mandate to cover substantial supply
disruptions on the world oil market.

The IEA has declined to coordinate a broader release among
its 28 industrialised members, but says that countries may
legitimately decide to release oil unilaterally.

“The Obama administration can only take so much political
pain from rising gasoline prices, which pose a serious threat to
the economy and the president’s re-election,” said Bob McNally,
a former White House energy adviser and head of U.S. energy
consultancy Rapidan.

“SPR (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) use is more a matter of
when than if. The administration strongly desires international
support and coordination from other strategic stock holders, but
is encountering stiff resistance from some IEA members who think
strategic stocks should only be used for severe supply
disruptions,” McNally said.

Top U.S. officials including Energy Secretary Steven Chu and
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner have said publicly in recent
weeks that a U.S. oil release is among the options the
government is considering.

While there is no significant disruption of world oil
supplies at the moment, sanctions on Iran are expected to cut
its output when a European Union embargo takes effect from July.
Minor stoppages from South Sudan, Yemen and Syria also have
contributed to the rise in oil prices.

“At the moment there is no need to use it,” IEA executive
director Maria van der Hoeven said of reserves at an industry
conference in Kuwait on Wednesday.

“There is more supply coming to the market from OPEC
countries. There is no price trigger for the stocks release, the
trigger is a disruption in physical supplies.”

“There is no real supply disruption, this is just price
management”, said Olivier Jakob from Vienna-based consultancy
Petromatrix.

OPEC’s biggest producer Saudi Arabia, the only oil producer
with any spare capacity, has said it is prepared to fill a
supply gap but will only do so to meet additional demand, rather
than as a preventative measure.

While the U.S. release would be of crude oil from the
national SPR, the UK contribution is likely to come from a
reduction of the minimum reserves of crude and refined products
that UK commercial oil companies are required to hold.

The United States has sold crude oil directly from the
700-million barrel SPR only a handful of times, almost always in
conjunction with the IEA.

In addition, the U.S. Department of Energy has arranged
unilateral short-term loans from the reserve about a dozen times
since it was filled in the 1980s, typically in much smaller
amounts.

(Additional reporting by Matt Falloon and Joshua Schneyer in
New York, Humeyra Pamuk in Kuwait, Zaida Espana in London;
Editing by Anthony Barker and Jim Marshall)


http://af.reuters.com/article/energy…8EFB7320120315

U.S. Federal Reserve joins Twitter

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55573-U-S-Federal-Reserve-joins-Twitter&goto=newpost

U.S. Federal Reserve joins Twitter

March 15, 2012 at 7:36 AM by AHN · Leave a Comment
Diane Alter – AHN News Reporter

Washington, D.C., United States (AHN) – The U.S. Federal Reserve, the financial backbone of the world’s biggest economy, announced Wednesday that it now has a Twitter account.

The central bank said it would use Twitter as a means to improve communications with the public. Its aim is to increase the accessibility and availability of Federal Reserve Board news.

The official Twitter channel is @federalreserve.

The Fed announced on its website that the site, www.federalreserve.gov, will remain the board’s “primary channel of communication,” while selected announcements “will be tweeted after they are first posted on the website.”

The first Fed tweets refer to the latest remarks from Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, the results of a study on mobile banking, and Bernanke’s lecture series slated for George Washington University on March 20-29.

Other tweets will deal with press releases, monetary reports, speeches and testimony.

http://gantdaily.com/2012/03/15/u-s-…ins-twitter-2/

U.S. Archaeologists Return To Explore Iraq’s Treasures

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55564-U-S-Archaeologists-Return-To-Explore-Iraq-s-Treasures&goto=newpost

U.S. Archaeologists Return To Explore Iraq’s Treasures

By Dan Vergano
March 14, 2012 1:05PM

Archaeologists are beginning to return to the war-ravaged nation of Iraq to explore the country’s rich archaeological history, joking that the only advice needed to uncover history there is “just dig.” Until very recently, war and international sanctions had closed locations such as Babylon, Nineveh and Ur to the world and to scholars.

There are so many vanished cities in Iraq — Babylon, Nineveh and Ur, just for starters — archaeologists joke that the only advice needed to uncover history is “just dig.”

War and international sanctions closed these locations to the world Relevant Products/Services and to scholars. The ruins of ancient Mesopotamia, in modern-day Iraq, have mostly seen visits from looters for the past two decades.

But that may be changing. A U.S. archaeology team that was one of the first to visit Iraq in more than two decades has just returned from a dig there. They are now among a growing list of other archaeologists returning to the war-ravaged nation.

“There is so much gloom and doom in news from Iraq, this is a really hopeful moment,” says archaeologist Elizabeth Stone of Stony Brook (N.Y) University. “Iraq, Mesopotamia, is so rich in archaeological sites. It was wonderful to be back.”

Stone spent Christmas in southern Iraq on a dig project co-headed by colleague Paul Zimansky. Sponsored by the National Geographic Society, their four-week visit marked the first U.S. archaeological efforts in the country outside of Kurdish regions in two decades, since the 1990 Gulf War, and one of the first foreign efforts in a decade as well.

Stone has been there before, notably on a helicopter tour of sites looted in the wake of the 2003 Iraq War. Stone and colleagues determined that robbers dug the equivalent of 3,700 acres of holes in archaeological sites across a region filled with ancient history.

“Things are better now, and there was real interest among Iraqi scholars and officials in resuming archaeological work there,” Stone says. Her team started at a site called Tell Sakhariya, near the southern Iraq city of Nasiriyah, about 4 miles from the ancient ruins of Ur, the fabled birthplace of Abraham in the Old Testament.

“As the last U.S. convoy was leaving (on Dec. 17), we were headed into Iraq,” Stone says.

Digging at first revealed an encampment for herders who flourished in the region after 1800 B.C. Even lower, they found the clay edges of a platform that once supported a ceremonial building more than 80 yards across, built by the kings of Ur around 2000 B.C. At the time, Ur was one of the largest cities in the world, whose citizens were great record-keepers of ancient days. They marked cuneiform symbols in mud bricks to record their business dealings.

“It’s very tentative, but the site may be Ga’esh, a place where Ur’s kings went every year for a festival renewing their rulership,” Stone says.

“Hopefully, things will remain stable and people will be able to go back,” she says. Archaeology in Iraq remains difficult, she acknowledges, noting her dig was possible only because the site was guarded and near an airbase.

For an encore, Stone and her colleagues have requested permission to investigate Ur itself, first heavily excavated by British archaeologist Charles Leonard Woolley eight decades ago. Discovery of the intact tomb of “Queen” Puabi, buried with 52 poisoned attendants and gold adornments, made Ur world famous.

“Woolley was very good for his time, but he didn’t have the methods we have now,” Stone says.

“We’re very hopeful we can return again.”


http://www.sci-tech-today.com/news/A…d=0320036CSRMO

Iraq to award oil blocks to MNCs

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55565-Iraq-to-award-oil-blocks-to-MNCs&goto=newpost

Iraq to award oil blocks to MNCs

Bloomberg News

Thu Mar 15 2012 08:54:30 GMT+0400 (Arabian Standard Time) Oman Time

BAGHDAD: Iraq’s Oil Ministry will issue the final draft contracts for the next round of energy-exploration rights on April 20, the director-general of the licensing department said.

Companies that were pre-selected to bid in the two-day May 30 licensing round have until today to comment on the preliminary drafts, Abdul Mahdy Al Ameedi said in an interview in Baghdad yesterday.

The licensing round has been repeatedly delayed to allow more time for companies to make remarks and changes so that the agreements are more attractive for investments.

Iraq has awarded 15 oil and natural-gas licences to foreign companies since the US-led invasion that ousted president Saddam Hussein in 2003. The country is the third-largest oil producer in Opec and seeks to develop natural gas to help generate electricity.

Iraq is auctioning 12 exploration areas, seven for oil and five for gas, according to the ministry. They contain 29 billion cubic metres of gas and 10 billion barrels of crude, Oil Minister Abdul Kareem Al Luaibi said. Forty-six companies have qualified for the bidding, including Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and Total.

http://www.timesofoman.com/innercat.asp?detail=1476

Lukoil To Scale Down West Africa Spending; Focus On Iraq

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55566-Lukoil-To-Scale-Down-West-Africa-Spending-Focus-On-Iraq&goto=newpost

Lukoil To Scale Down West Africa Spending; Focus On Iraq

Published March 15, 2012

Dow Jones Newswires

MOSCOW – Russian independent oil producer OAO Lukoil Holdings (LKOH.RS) intends to scale down spending plans in West Africa and instead shift focus to its West Qurna-2 project in Iraq, the company’s management said Wednesday at a strategy presentation, according to analysts present.

Of the $ 150 billion Lukoil plans to invest over the next 10 years, only $ 1 billion will be allocated to drilling in West Africa, analysts at VTB Capital told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.

“This is a significant relief as we had been concerned that it could have been substantially more,” VTB said.

Last year, Lukoil initiated an exploration program at offshore blocks in Ghana and the Ivory Coast, but has failed to find commercial reserves. The company said earlier this month it spent $ 417 million last year on unsuccessful exploration drilling, mainly due to dry holes in West Africa.

Lukoil said Wednesday it plans to spend $ 25 billion on the West Qurna-2 field and buy the 15% stake in the project that Norway’s Statoil ASA (STO) intends to sell.

Together with Statoil, Lukoil was awarded a 20-year service contract for West Qurna-2 in Iraq’s second licensing round held in December 2009. The companies promised to get the southern field pumping at a rate of 1.8 million barrels a day for payment of $ 1.15 a barrel.

Analyst Alexander Burgansky from Otkritie Capital said Lukoil’s management on Wednesday “disclosed more information on this project, which suggests faster than previously believed payback with most of the initial investments planned to be recouped within the first two years of the project’s life.”

A Lukoil spokesman was unable to immediately confirm any of the details provided by the bank analysts.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012…focus-on-iraq/

Iraq telco aims to launch 3G in 2012

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55567-Iraq-telco-aims-to-launch-3G-in-2012&goto=newpost

Iraq telco aims to launch 3G in 2012

Iraq: 13 hours, 42 minutes ago

The CEO Iraq’s Korek Telecom has said that the operator is looking to introduce a third-generation (3G) network in 2012, awaiting the government to release the necessary spectrum, Reuters has reported.

CEO Ghada Gebara has added that Korek, which acquired a 70% market share in the country’s Kurdish region in the north, has the right to use any technology we want in our licence, the idea is to get the right frequency.

“Iraq’s government has yet to decide whether it will charge a fee for the new spectrum, and extra fees would raise tariffs and slow down investment in new technologies to increase internet penetration”, Gebara has clarified.


http://www.ameinfo.com/293544.html

Kurds claim Iraq owes $1 bn for oil pumped in 2011

Source: Neno’s Place – A Community of Reality
URL: http://www.nenosplace.com/showthread.php?55568-Kurds-claim-Iraq-owes-1-bn-for-oil-pumped-in-2011&goto=newpost

Kurds claim Iraq owes $ 1 bn for oil pumped in 2011

AFP By Abdel Hamid Zebari | AFP – 7 hours ago

Iraqi Kurdistan claimed on Thursday that the central government has not handed over months of promised oil income while the region’s leader said officials in Baghdad were vindictive “failures”.

The charges were the latest in a long-running dispute over energy contracts and revenues between authorities in Baghdad and in the autonomous Kurdish region.

Kurdish leaders and the central government have squabbled over payments, revenue sharing and Baghdad’s refusal to recognise the dozens of oil contracts Arbil has signed with international energy firms.

On Thursday, the Kurdish regional government posted a statement on its website insisting it could increase its production to 175,000 barrels per day (bpd), but Baghdad “owes the KRG (Kurdistan Regional Government) more than $ 1 billion for revenues accrued in 2011.”

“Furthermore, not a single dollar has been received for exports in 2012.”

The statement accused the federal authorities of “failing to meet their obligations and honour their payment commitments to the KRG.”

It said the region could produce up to 250,000 bpd, “but only if the federal government honours its payment agreements. Otherwise, even the 90,000-100,000 barrels per day currently being exported will decline and eventually cease.”

Kurdistan confirmed in May 2011 that Iraq had paid oil contractors in the autonomous region as part of an “interim agreement on revenue allocation”.

Thursday’s statement said federal oil ministry claims of output of 65,000 bpd indicated a discrepancy that required an investigation “in case somebody is creaming off the difference between the oil received and the oil sold.”

Kurdistan regional president Massud Barzani sharply criticised central government officials who disputed the validity of Kurdish contracts with foreign firms.

“The officials in the central government who refuse to admit these contracts are failures who could not give to Iraq what we give to our people in Kurdistan,” Barzani said in a speech in regional capital Arbil. “They want us to be like them.”

He continued: “The problem is not whether these contracts violate the constitution or not, but that they (central government officials) do not want the region to develop.”

Barzani did not explicitly name any of the officials he was referring to.

The Kurdistan region has signed around 40 contracts with international companies on a production-sharing basis without seeking the express approval of the central government’s oil ministry.

The federal oil ministry, meanwhile, has awarded energy contracts to international companies on the basis of a per-barrel service fee. It has also refused to sign deals with any firm that has agreed a contract with Kurdistan.

That refusal was put in the spotlight in October, when Kurdistan inked a deal with ExxonMobil to explore six areas of the region. The US firm had previously signed a contract with Baghdad to ramp up production at the West Qurna-1 field, Iraq’s second-biggest.

Iraq has said the oil giant must choose between the two contracts.

Baghdad has also yet to approve an oil and gas law that would regulate the sector, with proposals languishing for several years.

http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/kur…143827282.html