MANAMA, Bahrain — The United States and Bahrain sought to project a unified front on Friday, five days after the king of Bahrain was quoted in leaked American diplomatic cables as urging Washington to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons by whatever means necessary.
Bahrain’s foreign minister, while declining to confirm the remarks attributed to King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, said the Persian Gulf kingdom had repeatedly told Iran that it should not pursue a military nuclear program. None of the king’s alleged comments, he said, contradicted Bahrain’s position.
“Every country in the Middle East has the right for nuclear power for peaceful use,” said the foreign minister, Sheik Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa, after a meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
But, he added, “when it comes to taking that power and developing it into a cycle for weapons grade, this is something that we can never accept and we can never live with in this region. We’ve said it to Iran.”
The deepening alarm among Persian Gulf states over Iran’s nuclear ambitions was not a big surprise. But the public disclosure of King Hamad’s combative comments — and similar ones by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia — has rattled the region. Gulf leaders have preferred to voice their fears about Iran privately, avoiding a direct confrontation with the Iranian regime.
At their meeting on Friday, however, Sheik Khalifa and Mrs. Clinton took pains to dampen suggestions that the WikiLeaks disclosures had disrupted relations between the United States and Bahrain, or that they could fracture the international effort to pressure Iran.
The subject of the cable came up at a lunch King Hamad gave for Mrs. Clinton at his palace, an official briefed on the meeting said. But she did not apologize, and the two were said to have laughed off the incident.
Publicly, Mrs. Clinton repeated her regret at the disclosure of the cables and said that many of the comments in them had been taken out of context. But she insisted that the leaks had not damaged America’s relations with other countries, and said there was no debate in the Middle East or elsewhere about the need to confront Iran to prevent it from obtaining a bomb. If anything, she seemed to suggest that international solidarity had strengthened.
“Obviously, if you’re the neighbor of a country that is pursuing nuclear weapons, that is viewed in a much more threatening way if you’re a concerned country many thousands of miles away,” she said. “But the concern is the same, and we hope that Iran will respond in kind to that concern.”
On Monday, Iranian negotiators will meet with the United States and other major powers in Geneva for the first time in more than a year to discuss its nuclear program and other issues. Mrs. Clinton said she hoped it would show flexibility. Despite the steady ratcheting up of pressure on Iran, she said the United States still would be open to engagement with Tehran.
Mrs. Clinton’s comments came on the last day of a four-country swing through Central Asia and the Persian Gulf, which gave her a firsthand taste of the fallout from the WikiLeaks disclosures.
News coverage of the revelations has been more limited in the Arab world than in the West. But, as on a previous stop in Kazakhstan, Mrs. Clinton was questioned about the cables by journalists and later by students at a town-hall meeting, and she offered the same mix of regret and resolve.
On another question, about whether Mrs. Clinton planned to run for president again, she offered a noteworthy response. After saying she would not — a general demurral she has given many times in settings like this overseas — she added an unusually explicit follow-up.
“I think I’ll serve as secretary of state as my last public position, and then probably go back to advocacy work, particularly on behalf of women and children,” Mrs. Clinton said.
That would appear to rule out not only a bid for the White House in 2016, but two other recently rumored scenarios: a spot on the ticket with President Obama in 2012, replacing Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., or a lateral move to defense secretary after Robert M. Gates retires next year.
Recent Comments